RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated24
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.26
Power efficiencyno data17.41
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC89AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4818176
Core clock speed450 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors486 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2001,423
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs16568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142
L1 Cacheno data17.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data960.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 3 December 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 300 Watt

320M Mac Edition has 1204.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M Mac Edition and RTX 6000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate GeForce 320M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 122 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M Mac Edition or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.