Radeon 540X vs GeForce 315 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.82
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT216Lexa
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 March 2010 (15 years ago)5 September 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48512
Core clock speed475 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1046 MHz
Number of transistors486 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate7.60033.47
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPS1.071 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache32 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2010 5 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 50 Watt

315 OEM has 51.5% lower power consumption.

Radeon 540X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 315 OEM and Radeon 540X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 315 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 540X is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GeForce 315 OEM
AMD Radeon 540X
Radeon 540X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 315 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 331 votes

Rate Radeon 540X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 315 OEM or Radeon 540X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.