GeForce2 Go 200 vs GeForce 315 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGT216NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 March 2010 (15 years ago)6 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed475 MHz143 MHz
Number of transistors486 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate7.6000.57
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2010 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 2 Watt

315 OEM has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 200, on the other hand, has 1550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 315 OEM and GeForce2 Go 200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 315 OEM is a desktop card while GeForce2 Go 200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GeForce 315 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200
GeForce2 Go 200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 25 votes

Rate GeForce 315 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 Go 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 315 OEM or GeForce2 Go 200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.