NVIDIA GeForce 305M vs Intel HD Graphics 500

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.10no data
ArchitectureGen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameApollo Laken11m-lp1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years old)10 January 2010 (14 years old)
Current price$414 $163
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1216
CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed300 MHz525 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate9.0004.200
Floating-point performance144.0 gflops36.8 gflops
Gigaflopsno data55

Size and compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 500 and GeForce 305M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem SharedUp to 700 (DDR3), Up to 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0
Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.97N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 500 298
+98.7%
GeForce 305M 150

HD Graphics 500 outperforms GeForce 305M by 99% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 September 2016 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 14 Watt

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 500 and GeForce 305M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500
NVIDIA GeForce 305M
GeForce 305M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 567 votes

Rate Intel HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.