Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce 3 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataEllesmere
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2002 (24 years ago)13 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speedno data973 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1073 MHz
Number of transistors27 Million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data120.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.846 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width32 / 64 / 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data211.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2002 13 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 3 Go has 7400% lower power consumption.

RX 560 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 3 Go and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 3 Go is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce 3 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 289 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 3 Go or Radeon RX 560 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.