Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs GeForce 3 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.16
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2002 (24 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors27 Million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data259.2
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width32 / 64 / 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2002 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 80 Watt

GeForce 3 Go has 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 3 Go and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 3 Go is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce 3 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 58 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 3 Go or Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.