Radeon HD 8310E vs GeForce 256 SDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.49
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV10Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 1999 (26 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed120 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors17 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.482.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed143 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 1999 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 220 nm 28 nm

HD 8310E has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 256 SDR and Radeon HD 8310E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 256 SDR is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8310E is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 141 votes

Rate GeForce 256 SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 256 SDR or Radeon HD 8310E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.