Radeon 680M vs GeForce 256 SDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameNV10 A3RDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 1999 (24 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed120 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors17 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate0.48115.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.686 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed143 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 1999 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 220 nm 6 nm

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 3566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 256 SDR and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 256 SDR is a desktop card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
GeForce 256 SDR
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 67 votes

Rate GeForce 256 SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 898 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.