Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce 256 DDR
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | NV10 A3 | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 December 1999 (24 years ago) | 5 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Current price | $157 | $448 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 120 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 17 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 220 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.48 | 140.3 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 4,506 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce 256 DDR and Radeon Pro 575 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 December 1999 | 5 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 220 nm | 14 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce 256 DDR and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
