Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs GeForce 210

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameGT218GL40
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (14 years ago)1 October 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 no data
Current price$96 (3.3x MSRP)$77

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1610
CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed589 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.160no data
Floating-point performance39.36 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 210 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length6.60" (16.8 cm)no data
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/Ano data
CUDA+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3248 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 162 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.