ATI FireGL V8600 vs GeForce 210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.82no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT218SR600
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 $1,899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16320
Core clock speed589 MHz688 MHz
Number of transistors260 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Watt159 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.16011.01
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS0.4403 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm254 mm
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz868 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s111.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.13.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 159 Watt

GeForce 210 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 430% lower power consumption.

ATI FireGL V8600, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V8600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3987 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or FireGL V8600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.