GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs 210 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168
Core clock speed520 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors260 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1603.600
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS0.0176 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 12 Watt

210 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9100M G mGPU, on the other hand, has 158.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 Rev. 2 or GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.