Arctic Sound 2T vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGT218Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores167680 ×2
Core clock speed520 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors260 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4120 ×2
TMUs8240 ×2
L2 Cache32 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed400 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 500 Watt

210 Rev. 2 has 1513% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 Rev. 2 or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.