GeForce GT 240M LE vs 210 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT216G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)15 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed475 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors486 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate3.8009.600
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.21.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 15 January 2010
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 23 Watt

210 PCI has a 38% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 35% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 PCI and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 85 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 PCI or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.