T400 vs GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.07
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV11TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2001 (24 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1384
Core clock speedno data420 MHz
Boost clock speed166 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width32 / 64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2001 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 30 Watt

2 Go (200 / 100) has 1400% lower power consumption.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and T400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) is a notebook graphics card while T400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
NVIDIA T400
T400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 401 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 410 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.