Radeon RX 6300 XT vs GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV11Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2001 (24 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11024
Boost clock speed166 MHz2500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data160.0
Floating-point processing powerno data5.12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width32 / 64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 100 Watt

2 Go (200 / 100) has 4900% lower power consumption.

RX 6300 XT, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and Radeon RX 6300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6300 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
AMD Radeon RX 6300 XT
Radeon RX 6300 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 401 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) or Radeon RX 6300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.