Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP vs GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV11Kalindi
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2001 (25 years ago)23 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1128
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed166 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 / 64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed143 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2001 23 November 2013
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 25 Watt

2 Go (200 / 100) has 1150% lower power consumption.

HD 8400 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 401 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) or Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.