ATI Radeon 3000 IGP vs GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV11RS780
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2001 (25 years ago)2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed166 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data180 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data1.400
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 / 64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed143 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

ATI 3000 IGP has a 177% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and Radeon 3000 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 3000 IGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 401 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 329 votes

Rate Radeon 3000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) or Radeon 3000 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.