RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV11AD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2001 (23 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15120
Core clock speedno data1110 MHz
Boost clock speed166 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data247.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.82 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB12 GB
Memory bus width32 / 64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2001 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 100 Watt

2 Go (200 / 100) has 4900% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 22 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 302 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.