Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs GRID RTX T10-4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTU102Kalindi
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2020 (5 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584128
Core clock speed1065 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate312.53.200
Floating-point processing power9.999 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2248
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores56no data
L1 Cache3.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

GRID RTX T10-4 has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8240 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID RTX T10-4 and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID RTX T10-4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-4
GRID RTX T10-4
AMD Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID RTX T10-4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID RTX T10-4 or Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.