HD Graphics 12EU vs GRID RTX T10-4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameTU102Ironlake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2020 (5 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358496
Core clock speed1065 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate312.56.396
Floating-point processing power9.999 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs642
TMUs22412
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores56no data
L1 Cache3.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16QPI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1
Shader Model6.84.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

GRID RTX T10-4 has a 275% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID RTX T10-4 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID RTX T10-4 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-4
GRID RTX T10-4
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID RTX T10-4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID RTX T10-4 or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.