Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU vs GRID RTX T10-4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU102no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2020 (5 years ago)31 October 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358418
Core clock speed1065 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1395 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.5no data
Floating-point processing power9.999 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs224no data
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores56no data
L1 Cache3.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU has a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID RTX T10-4 and M3 Pro 18-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID RTX T10-4 is a workstation graphics card while Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-4
GRID RTX T10-4
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID RTX T10-4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 190 votes

Rate M3 Pro 18-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID RTX T10-4 or M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.