GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs GRID RTX T10-16

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated124
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Power efficiencyno data51.60
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU102AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46082560
Core clock speed1065 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate401.8140.4
Floating-point processing power12.86 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28880
Tensor Cores57680
Ray Tracing Cores7220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1575 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth604.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.58.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 50 Watt

GRID RTX T10-16 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID RTX T10-16 and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID RTX T10-16 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-16
GRID RTX T10-16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2724 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.