GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs GRID M60-4A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking646not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.01no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGM204NV36S
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)18 August 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed557 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate150.81.700
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1284
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 18 August 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 25 Watt

GRID M60-4A has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID M60-4A and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M60-4A is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M60-4A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M60-4A or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.