STG vs GRID M6-8Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking535not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.55no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameGM204NV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed722 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate69.310.08
Floating-point processing power2.218 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs961
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5FPM
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)1.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 2 Watt

GRID M6-8Q has an age advantage of 19 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

STG, on the other hand, has 4900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID M6-8Q and STG. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M6-8Q is a workstation graphics card while STG is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q
NVIDIA STG
STG

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M6-8Q or STG, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.