ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO vs GRID M6-8Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking543not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.57no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGM204RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)1 July 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed722 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate69.311.600
Floating-point processing power2.218 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs964
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 1 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

GRID M6-8Q has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID M6-8Q and All-In-Wonder X600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M6-8Q is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X600 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M6-8Q or All-In-Wonder X600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.