Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking748not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed1033 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06319.2
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1664
TMUs32256
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 May 2016 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

GRID M40 has 400% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Nano, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID M40 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.