ATI Radeon DDR VIVO vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking746not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.09no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM107Rage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1033 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate33.061.098
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs326
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Width2-slot1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s5.856 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 May 2016 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GRID M40 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID M40 and Radeon DDR VIVO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon DDR VIVO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
ATI Radeon DDR VIVO
Radeon DDR VIVO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or Radeon DDR VIVO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.