AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1033 MHz
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 5200 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1000 MHz
- Max video memory 16 GB
- Memory type HBM2
- Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 453 | 427 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GM107 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 (6 years old) | 26 August 2018 (4 years old) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,870 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 336.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | no data |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU outperforms GRID M10-8Q by 9% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 6.63 | 7.25 |
| Recency | 18 May 2016 | 26 August 2018 |
| Memory bus width | 128 | 2048 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 3584 |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 | 512 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of GRID M10-8Q by AMD
The nearest GRID M10-8Q's AMD equivalent is FirePro R5000, which is faster by 2% and higher by 4 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GRID M10-8Q:
Competitors of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU by NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU from NVIDIA is Quadro K1200, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
