ATI Graphics Ultra + vs GRID K560Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK104Mach32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (11 years ago)1 January 1992 (34 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2no data
Core clock speed745 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.36 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×21
TMUs128 ×2no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×21 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×280.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

GRID K560Q has an age advantage of 22 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K560Q and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K560Q is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K560Q
GRID K560Q
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K560Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K560Q or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.