Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs GRID K540Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK104Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616384
Core clock speed745 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate95.361,638
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs32no data
TMUs1281024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 2400 Watt

GRID K540Q has 966.7% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K540Q and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K540Q is a workstation graphics card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K540Q
GRID K540Q
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K540Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 81 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.