ATI FireGL V7600 vs GRID K520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.88no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK104R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)6 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2240
Core clock speed745 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt127 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×27.200
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×20.288 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×212
TMUs128 ×212
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×251.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 127 Watt

GRID K520 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7600, on the other hand, has 77% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K520 and FireGL V7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GRID K520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K520 or FireGL V7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.