A100 SXM4 vs GRID K520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.87no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×26912
Core clock speed745 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×2609.1
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×219.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×2160
TMUs128 ×2432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache128 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×240 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×25120 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×21,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA3.08.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 400 Watt

GRID K520 has 77.8% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K520 and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K520
GRID K520
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GRID K520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K520 or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.