ATI Radeon DDR vs GRID K500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK104Rage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (11 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2no data
Core clock speed745 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×21
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×22
TMUs128 ×26
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×232 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×25.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 23 Watt

GRID K500 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI DDR, on the other hand, has 878.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K500 and Radeon DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon DDR is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500
ATI Radeon DDR
Radeon DDR

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K500 or Radeon DDR, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.