GRID K340 vs Quadro P4000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro P4000
30.10
+877%

Quadro P4000 outperforms GRID K340 by 877% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking171717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money25.23no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP104GK107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years old)23 July 2013 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 $3,299
Current price$485 (0.6x MSRP)$99 (0x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1202 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate165.830.40
Floating-point performance5,304 gflops4x 729.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7604 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA6.13.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+1033%
6−7
−1033%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+960%
5−6
−960%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1014%
7−8
−1014%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+1000%
7−8
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%
Hitman 3 90−95
+933%
9−10
−933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+983%
6−7
−983%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+886%
7−8
−886%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+960%
5−6
−960%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1014%
7−8
−1014%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+1000%
7−8
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%
Hitman 3 90−95
+933%
9−10
−933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+983%
6−7
−983%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+940%
5−6
−940%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+886%
7−8
−886%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+1000%
7−8
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+960%
5−6
−960%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1014%
7−8
−1014%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+1000%
7−8
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Hitman 3 50−55
+940%
5−6
−940%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+1000%
6−7
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+960%
5−6
−960%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1060%
5−6
−1060%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+950%
6−7
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Hitman 3 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

This is how Quadro P4000 and GRID K340 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro P4000 is 1033% faster than GRID K340

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 30.10 3.08
Recency 6 February 2017 23 July 2013
Cost $815 $3299
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 225 Watt

The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate NVIDIA GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.