GeForce 8600M GT SLI vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking818not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G8x (2007)
GPU code nameGK107NB8P-GS
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)23 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×464
Core clock speed950 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million598 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×4no data
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs8 ×4no data
TMUs32 ×4no data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×41 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 23 October 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 20 Watt

GRID K340 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8600M GT SLI, on the other hand, has 1025% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K340 and GeForce 8600M GT SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8600M GT SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
GeForce 8600M GT SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or GeForce 8600M GT SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.