ATI FireMV 2260 vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking806not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.98no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK107RV620
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×440
Core clock speed950 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×42.000
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs8 ×44
TMUs32 ×44
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×4256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×464 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MBps
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

GRID K340 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2260, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K340 and FireMV 2260. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while FireMV 2260 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
ATI FireMV 2260
FireMV 2260

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or FireMV 2260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.