Tesla C870 vs GRID K280Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking532not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK104G80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)2 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,875 $1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536128
Core clock speed745 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate95.3638.40
Floating-point performance2.289 gflops0.3456 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 2 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 171 Watt

GRID K280Q has an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla C870, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K280Q and Tesla C870. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K280Q
GRID K280Q
NVIDIA Tesla C870
Tesla C870

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.