GeForce GT 710 PCI vs GRID K280Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking600not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency2.32no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK104GF119
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)2 April 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,875 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153648
Core clock speed745 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate95.366.480
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz667 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s10.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.02.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 29 Watt

GRID K280Q has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

GT 710 PCI, on the other hand, has 676% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K280Q and GeForce GT 710 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K280Q is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 710 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 71 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K280Q or GeForce GT 710 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.