Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking592not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGK104Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)1 January 2001 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.360.25
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1282
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GRID K260Q has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K260Q and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K260Q is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K260Q or Matrox G450 x4 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.