A100 SXM4 80 GB vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Power efficiency2.39no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)16 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15366912
Core clock speed745 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36609.1
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs128432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache128 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.08.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 16 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 400 Watt

GRID K260Q has 77.8% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K260Q and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 81 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K260Q or A100 SXM4 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.