Iris Plus Graphics 930 vs GRID K2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking611not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.23no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameGK104Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 May 2013 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$5,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2256
Core clock speed745 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×216.00
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×20.512 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×28
TMUs128 ×216
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2.175-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 930 has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K2 and Iris Plus Graphics 930. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K2 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 930 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K2
GRID K2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 930
Iris Plus Graphics 930

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14 votes

Rate GRID K2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K2 or Iris Plus Graphics 930, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.