ATI FireMV 2200 vs GRID K140Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking972not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency1.03no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGK107RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed850 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.601.296
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs164
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz392 MBps
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s3.136 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

GRID K140Q has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200, on the other hand, has 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K140Q and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K140Q is a workstation graphics card while FireMV 2200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K140Q
GRID K140Q
ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K140Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K140Q or FireMV 2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.