Radeon Pro V520 vs GRID K100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed850 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60230.4
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16144
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 225 Watt

GRID K100 has 73.1% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K100 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K100
GRID K100
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K100 or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.