Radeon 630 vs GRID K100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.89
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed850 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6038.98
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1632
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K100 and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K100
GRID K100
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K100 or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.