Radeon RX 5300 XT vs GRID K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking993not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.91no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 March 2013 (12 years ago)7 October 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,140 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192 ×41024
Core clock speed850 MHz1670 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1845 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60 ×4118.1
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS ×43.779 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×432
TMUs16 ×464
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×44 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s ×4112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2013 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 150 Watt

GRID K1 has 15.4% lower power consumption.

RX 5300 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K1 and Radeon RX 5300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K1 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K1
GRID K1
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
Radeon RX 5300 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate GRID K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K1 or Radeon RX 5300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.