Quadro FX 550M vs GRID K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking999not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.92no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK107G73
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 March 2013 (12 years ago)13 March 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,140 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192 ×4no data
Core clock speed850 MHz480 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60 ×45.760
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs16 ×48
TMUs16 ×412
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×4512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s ×416 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2013 13 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

GRID K1 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 550M, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K1 and Quadro FX 550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K1 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K1
GRID K1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate GRID K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K1 or Quadro FX 550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.