Radeon Pro V320 vs GRID A100A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGA100Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69123584
Core clock speed900 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate434.2336.0
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs19264
TMUs432224
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MB896 KB
L2 Cache48 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eHBM2
Maximum RAM amount48 GB8 GB
Memory bus width6144 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 230 Watt

GRID A100A has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pro V320, on the other hand, has 73.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID A100A or Radeon Pro V320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.