Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs GRID A100A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGA100Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)2 September 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912768
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate434.252.80
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
ROPs19224
TMUs43248
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data3.75 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width6144 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 15 Watt

GRID A100A has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 2566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 166 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID A100A or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.