Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GMA
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GMA with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GMA by a whopping 272600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1534 | 200 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 54.33 |
| Architecture | PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Cloverview | AD107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 26 February 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2025 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.066 | 129.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 1 | 32 |
| TMUs | 2 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | ES 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 27.27 |
| Recency | 4 May 2010 | 26 February 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 272600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GMA in performance tests.
Be aware that GMA is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
